Scorecard: CM-4 · Etch family matching review
Claim from ops: “Chambers matched after golden copy.â€
Format: Scorecard cells. Not a matching theory lecture.
Scorecard (weekly)
| Metric | Ch-A | Ch-B | Ch-C | Gate | Result | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CD mean delta vs ref | 0.3 nm | 0.4 nm | 1.9 nm | ≤1.0 | C fail | | Edge-die sigma | OK | OK | High | spec | C fail | | Particle adders | OK | OK | OK | spec | pass | | RF-hours bucket | Mid | Mid | High | declare | mismatch | | Season kit ID | K2 | K2 | K1 | same | mismatch |
Average CD across A/B looked fine in the dashboard that hides C.

Family averages are how chamber C stays employed.
What “golden copy†copied
Recipe parameters: yes.
RF-hour state: no.
Kit ID: no.
Edge map ownership: no.
Copying the recipe file is not matching. Matching is a gate table.
Decision
- Quarantine Ch-C from edge-critical layers until kit + RF-hour playbook done.
- Dashboard must show per-chamber gates, not family mean.
- Matching review requires scorecard ID in MES before release.

If the kit letters differ, stop saying matched.
Adjacent fences
DOE etch reports own causal factor tests. Wet-bath notebooks own chemistry lifetime. Implant dose walks own Faraday truth. CM-4 owns matching as a scored gate. Do not golden-copy a recipe onto a high-hour kit and call it science.
Sign-off
Process ____ Equipment ____ Yield ____
Unsigned scorecards are decorations.
