Document: Utility invoice · Site 4 · Billing period 익명
Method: Line-by-line markup
Rule: Finance가 total만 읽으면 engineering이 fiction을 inherit.
INVOICE TOTAL (summary)
Energy charge ............. ####.##
Demand charge ............. ####.## ← LINE 1
Reactive / PF penalty ..... ####.## ← LINE 2
Rider / adjustment ........ ###.## ← LINE 3
Taxes ..................... ###.##
LINE 1 — Demand charge (ratchet)
Marked: peak interval paint cure + oven bank와 일치 (prior curve work 참조).
Finance margin note: “usage down 4%.”
Engineering note: usage는 demand 아님.
Action: shared calendar owner; battery brochure 아직 아님.
LINE 2 — Reactive / PF
Marked: idling motor·lazy PF correction bank 있는 night baseline.
Quiet kW, noisy kVAR.
Action: tariff language argue 전 banks·idling policy fix.
Total circling은 analysis 아님.
LINE 3 — Rider / “adjustment”
Marked: invoice feeder tag가 peak cause process와 mismatch.
Building B verbally optimize; meter는 Building A west.
Action: meter dictionary change control 하.
LINE 4 — Energy charge에 hidden
TOU block이 “production stop” 후 shoulder cleaning load 표시.
Cleaning은 org chart agree 여부와 무관 energy team.
LINE 5 — Missing
AP packet에 interval CSV 없음.
Interval 없으면 debate는 mythology.
Rule added: AP는 interval export energy share filed 없이 demand dispute pay 안 함.
CSV absent면 argument absent.
Adjacent fences
Annotated demand-curve essay는 day shape. BESS deck은 storage economics. UPS cascade는 ride-through. Regen VFD는 cell recovery. This page는 bill as evidence 소유. Mis-tagged feeder correct하려 battery buy 금지.
Endorsement box
Energy owner ______ Finance ______ Production calendar owner ______
Three signature 없으면 next invoice는 same story new number로 reprint.